Medical Technology Inequitable Conduct / Intellectual Property

A leading global supplier of health care solutions brought forward a suit against a competing interest who alleged the claimant was infringing their patent. As with most patent infringement cases, lengthy periods of tedious testimony were necessary, and could have easily caused jurors to become bored and disinterested. An entertainment factor needed to be built in to ensure the juror’s attention was maintained while being informed of the facts in the case.

The consultant produced 13 demonstratives in order to facilitate a more engaging presentation. These graphics had multiple revisions, and had to be produced in a short time frame.

The Result

The jurors determined that the claimant’s past and continued use of their technology was protected, and they were found NOT to have infringed. Additionally, the defendant’s patents were ruled invalid. The presenting attorney credits the demonstratives with allowing the trial to flow smoothly, lending clarity to otherwise confusing testimony, and holding the attention of the judge and jury.

To see the resume of the expert associated with this case study, see the link below.